Incident Summary:
1/16/1988: Addam Swapp bombed the Kamas Stake Center, a meeting house for Latter Day Saints congregations, in Marion, Utah, United States. There were no casualties but the building was destroyed at a cost of $1.5 million. Swapp was commemorating the nine-year anniversary of the death of John Singer, his father-in-law and a fellow excommunicated member of the LDS Church, who was killed by the police as they attempted to arrest him.
Overview
GTD ID:
198801160009
When:
1988-01-16
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Utah
City:
Marion
Location Details:
Wasatch Mountains
What
Attack Information
| Type of Attack () |
Bombing/Explosion |
| Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
| Target Type: Religious Figures/Institutions |
|---|
| Name of Entity |
Latter Days Saints church |
| Specific Description |
Kamas Stake Center in Marion Utah |
| Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
| Hostages |
No |
| Ransom |
No |
| Property Damage |
Yes |
| Extent of Property Damage |
Major (likely > $1 million but < $1 billion) |
| Value of Property Damage |
$1,500,000.00 |
How
Weapon Information
| Type |
Sub-type |
| Explosives |
Dynamite/TNT |
| Weapon Details |
|---|
| 50 pounds of dynamite with a booster of ammonium nitrate |
Additional Information
| Suicide Attack? | No |
| Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
| Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
| Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
| Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
| Additional Information |
The bomb exploded around 3:00 AM. Over one year before the incident, Addam Swapp accused thirteen people in Marion of being responsible for John Singer's death and called the LDS Church 'evil.' Immediately after the bombing, Swapp stuck a spear into church property with nine feathers to symbolize the nine years it had been since Singer's death. Swapp refused to surrender to authorities and holed up on his property with thirteen other relatives. The stand-off lasted thirteen days and one police officer died during the confrontation. |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
| Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
| Mormon Extremist |
No |
Perpetrator Statistics
| Number of Perpetrators |
1 |
| Number of Captured Perpetrators |
1 |
Casualty Information
| Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
| Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
| Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
| Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
| Total Number of Injured |
0 |
| Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
| Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
| "Standoff Goes On at Polygamist's Utah Compound," New York Times, January 19, 1988. |
| Utah Highway Patrol History, "1980 - 1989 / Return to Marion," Utah Department of Public Safety, 2010. |
| "Domestic News," United Press International, January 16, 1988. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties
Back to Search Results