Incident Summary:
2/13/1997: Harry Shapiro placed a pipe bomb at the Jacksonville Jewish Center in Jacksonville, Florida, United States. The bomb did not detonate and was discovered by a group of children nine days later. Former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres spoke at the Conservative Jewish synagogue on the same day the bomb was scheduled to detonate.
Overview
GTD ID:
199702130003
When:
1997-02-13
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Florida
City:
Jacksonville
What
Attack Information
| Type of Attack () |
Bombing/Explosion |
| Successful Attack? () |
No |
Target Information ()
| Target Type: Religious Figures/Institutions |
|---|
| Name of Entity |
Jewish institution hosting a speech by former Israeli Prime Minister Simon Peres |
| Specific Description |
Jacksonville Jewish Center |
| Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
| Hostages |
No |
| Ransom |
No |
| Property Damage |
No |
How
Weapon Information
| Type |
Sub-type |
| Explosives |
Time Fuse |
| Weapon Details |
|---|
| Nine inch pipe bomb consisting of blasting caps, gun powder and a nine volt battery connected to a wristwatch |
Additional Information
| Suicide Attack? | No |
| Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
| Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
| Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
| Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
| Additional Information |
Three hours before Shimon Peres was scheduled to speak, an anonymous caller (later determined to be Harry Shapiro) claiming to represent the American Friends of the Islamic Jihad warned the Jacksonville police that there were two bombs placed at the Synagogue. The caller stated, "one (bomb) is at the front hallway. Find it and you'll know we are serious. You will not find the other." Authorities subsequently search the building but did not discover any bombs. When the device was discovered nine days later, it was accompanied by a note with Shapiro's grievances. He was against Israel's participation in and Peres' support of the Middle East peace process. Shapiro claimed that the bomb was "incapable of exploding" but the authorities could not determine if the device was, in fact, a hoax. |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
| Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
| Jewish Extremists |
No |
Perpetrator Statistics
| Number of Perpetrators |
1 |
| Number of Captured Perpetrators |
1 |
Casualty Information
| Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
| Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
| Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
| Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
| Total Number of Injured |
0 |
| Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
| Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
| Kevin Sack, "Florida Man Put Bomb at Peres Speech, Police Say," New York Times, February 26, 1997. |
| "Suspect Held In a Bombing Tries Suicide," New York Times, February 28, 1997. |
| "Federal Charges Filed in Synagogue Bomb Case," Sarasota Herald Tribune, March 20, 1997. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties
Back to Search Results