Incident Summary:
10/29/2000: 51 soldiers led by Lieutenant Colonel Ollanta Humala Tasso took brief control of the Toquepala copper mine and the mining town of Masocruz, Tacna province, Peru. They fled with four hostages, including three mine workers and General Oscar Bardales, and took several vehicles belonging to the mine. They later released the three mine workers and returned the vehicles the next day. The army captured the renegade soldiers the next day, although eight remained at large, including the leader. The soldiers who revolted questioned the legitimacy of the President Alberto Fujimori and his former intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos. They stated that the President had not been elected by the people.
Overview
GTD ID:
200010290003
When:
2000-10-29
Country:
Peru
Region:
South America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Puno
City:
Near Mazocruz
Location Details:
The Toquepala copper mine and the mining town of Masocruz
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Hostage Taking (Kidnapping) |
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Business |
Name of Entity |
Copper mine |
Specific Description |
Toquepala copper mine |
Nationality of Target |
Peru |
Target Type: Private Citizens & Property |
Name of Entity |
Civilians |
Specific Description |
Mine workers at Toquepala copper mine |
Nationality of Target |
Peru |
Additional Information
Hostages |
Yes |
Number of Hostages |
4 |
US Hostages |
0 |
Days of Kidnapping |
1 |
Outcome |
Combination |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Unknown |
Extent of Property Damage |
Unknown |
Value of Property Damage |
Unknown |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Unknown |
|
Weapon Details |
No mention of specific weapons was made |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Doubt Terrorism Proper () |
No |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
Rebel Military Unit |
Yes (Confirmed: Unknown; Mode: Other) |
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
51 |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
43 |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"Small group of soldiers stage revolt in Peru," Dow Jones International News, October 29, 2000. |
Ricardo Uztarroz, "Rebel soldiers on the run in Peruvian highlands," Agence France-Presse, October 30, 2000. |
Will Weissert, "Standoff draws to an end; Peruvians weigh merits of uprising," Associated Press, October 30, 2000. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties