A Department of Homeland Security Emeritus Center of Excellence led by the University of Maryland

A consortium of researchers dedicated to improving the understanding of the human causes and consequences of terrorism

Media Salience and Frame Changing in the Coverage of Mass Shootings: A Comparison of Ideological and Non-Ideological Attacks


Media Salience and Frame Changing in the Coverage of Mass Shootings: A Comparison of Ideological and Non-Ideological Attacks

Abstract: 

Public concern over two distinct forms of episodic violence – mass shootings and terrorism – remains heightened. While historically regarded as distinct phenomenon, recent mass shootings expose a blurring of lines between them. Articles in the New York Times for both ideological (terrorist and extreme far-right) and non-ideological (school and workplace) mass shootings were analyzed to assess media framing and possible shifts in coverage over time. The findings indicate that while sharing many similarities, how these types of mass shootings are framed by the media diverge when the connotation of terrorism is present. In return, this may impact how news consumers come to understand these events.

Publication Information

Full Citation: 

Schildkraut, Jaclyn and Jeff Gruenewald. 2019. "Media Salience and Frame Changing in the Coverage of Mass Shootings: A Comparison of Ideological and Non-Ideological Attacks." Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 19 (September). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b0ee82df793927c77add8b6/t/5d712445c2601b0001d064e6/1567695943246/Media+Salience+and+Frame+Changing+Reframing+Mass+Shootings+Draft.pdf

START Author(s): 
Jeff Gruenewald
Publication URL: 
Visit Website

Additional Info

Regions: