Incident Summary:
4/11/1995: An unexploded homemade incendiary device was found underneath a delivery truck of the Oneonta Beef Inc., a meat distribution plant in DeWitt, New York, a suburb of Syracuse in the United States. There were no casualties, nor property damage as the device failed to ignite. The device was made from a pair of two-liter plastic soda bottles containing flammable liquid, and was held together with duct tape, a book of matches and a fuse. Animal rights activists, specifically members of the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) who were also believed to be affiliated with the Animal Defense League were suspected to be responsible for the incident. Three days later, a second incendiary was placed at the beef company, and that time, it caused a fire resulting in damages (41495).
Overview
GTD ID:
199504110004
When:
1995-04-11
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
New York
City:
DeWitt
Location Details:
at Oneonta Beef Inc., a meat packing plant outside Syracuse, NY
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
No |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Business |
Name of Entity |
Oneonta Beef Inc. |
Specific Description |
meat distribution plant in DeWitt, NY |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
No |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Incendiary |
Gasoline or Alcohol |
Weapon Details |
incendiary device made from a pair of two-liter plastic soda bottles containing flammable liquid, and held together with duct tape, a book of matches and a fuse |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Additional Information |
The device was discovered by an employee of the company at about 5:00am. The authorities were questioning and investigating a number of young suspects, who were affiliated with the Animal Defense League and Animal Liberation Front (ALF). However, it seems the investigation came to a halt, and perpetrators were not identified. This incident is related to the firebombing of the same target three days later, and is believed to have been committed by the same perpetrator(s), since the first incendiary failed to ignite. |
Who
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
J. Trout Lowen, "Animal Rights Activists May be Targeting Small DeWitt Meat Company," The Post-Standard, April 18, 1995. |
Hart Seely, "Animal Rights Protests not 'Kids Stuff' Anymore," The Post-Standard, April 21, 1996. |
Lori Duffy, "Activists Suspected in Meat Plant Arson, Local Animal Rights Activists Say Recent Incidents have made Victims of them as well," The Post-Standard, April 19, 1995. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties