Incident Summary:
05/14/1986: In Palo Verde, Arizona in the United States, unknown perpetrators sabotaged three 500,000-volt power lines (including the North Gila Line) to the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, which is operated by the Arizona Nuclear Power Project, by climbing the towers and throwing metal-weighted ropes onto the wires. The high-voltage power lines were short-circuited, and though no electricity was lost, damages were estimated at $29,000 for repairs to the power lines and set back construction on completion of the plant.
Overview
GTD ID:
198605140015
When:
1986-05-14
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Arizona
City:
Palo Verde
Location Details:
The incident occurred about 25-35 miles outside the nuclear power plant in Palo Verde, AZ
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Utilities |
Name of Entity |
Arizona Nuclear Power Project |
Specific Description |
three high-voltage power lines to the Palo Verde nuclear plant |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Target Type: Utilities |
Name of Entity |
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station |
Specific Description |
power lines , Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Yes |
Extent of Property Damage |
Minor (likely < $1 million) |
Value of Property Damage |
$29,000.00 |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Sabotage Equipment |
|
Weapon Details |
metal-weighted ropes thrown onto wires to short circuit power lines |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Additional Information |
The lines connect Palo Verde, located 50 miles west of downtown Phoenix, with two parts of the Phoenix metropolitan area and Yuma, in extreme southwestern Arizona. |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
Unknown |
No |
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"High-Voltage Lines to N-Plant Short-Circuited; Sabotage Blamed," The Associated Press, May 15, 1986. |
Larry Lopez, "A Puzzling Case Of Apparent Nuclear Sabotage," The Associated Press, June 3, 1986. |
Lori K. Weinraub, "Palo Verde sabotage probed," Mohave Daily Miner, May 16, 1986. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties